Expectations vs. Outcomes: Photography
We started
taking digital pictures of the Hetherington Collection in January. Armed with
our trusty SLR, we presumed that lamps would not be all that difficult to photograph.
After all, they don’t move, they’re not shiny, and they’re not very big. As it
turns out, lamps are especially tricky to photograph, especially in the
unflattering glow of the fluorescent lighting in the anthropology lab here at U
of W. Val McKinley and Jodi Schmidt, the curator of the anthropology collection
and the anthro lab technician, have graciously allowed us the run of the lab
for our photoshoots and we’ve discovered that the best photographic equipment
is often whatever happens to be close by at the moment.
Just right |
Too washed out/not enough detail |
We’ve also realized that what looks good on the camera display does not always translate to a good image on the computer screen. In particular, we’ve found that the orange and salmon hues of terra cotta are overemphasized by the SLR camera and that sometimes, a cellphone creates a more faithful image.
As it turns
out, we are learning more day by day about photography, meaning our research
has extended far beyond the lamps. Once we turn to some of the wooden and metallic
objects in the collection, we’ll have to start the process again.
Comments
Post a Comment